<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeff Random - new media and metatheory remix &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffrandom.com/category/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffrandom.com</link>
	<description>new media and metatheory remix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Animated Search Engine Bot Crawl Visualizations</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/animated-search-engine-bot-crawl-visualizations/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/animated-search-engine-bot-crawl-visualizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 05:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2006/06/04/animated-search-engine-bot-crawl-visualizations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These Animated Search Engine Bot Crawl Visualizations are the result of a one year experiment on the behaviour of Yahoo, MSN &#038; Google search engine bots. You can click on the pictures to watch the animated visualizations from drunkmenworkhere. MSN Bot Visual Animation Yahoo Slurp Visual Animation Google Bot Visual Animation Definitely worth further study. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Animated Search Engine Bot Crawl Visualizations are the result of a one year experiment on the behaviour of Yahoo, MSN &#038; Google search engine bots. </p>
<p>You can click on the pictures to watch the animated visualizations from <a href="http://drunkmenworkhere.org">drunkmenworkhere</a>.<br />
<center><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/msn-bot-crawl-visual-animation/">MSN Bot Visual Animation</a><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/msn-bot-crawl-visual-animation/"><img src="http://jeffrandom.com/images/msn-bot-tree.png" alt="MSN Bot Visual Animation" /></a><br />
</center><br />
<br />
<center><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/yahoo-bot-crawl-visual-animation/">Yahoo Slurp Visual Animation</a><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/yahoo-bot-crawl-visual-animation/"><img src="http://jeffrandom.com/images/yahoo-slurp-tree.png" alt="Yahoo Slurp Visual Animation" /></a><br />
</center></p>
<p><center><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/google-bot-crawl-visual-animation/">Google Bot Visual Animation</a><br />
<a href="http://jeffrandom.com/google-bot-crawl-visual-animation/"><img src="http://jeffrandom.com/images/google-bot-tree.jpg" alt="Google Bot Visual Animation" /></a><br />
</center><br />
Definitely worth further study. </p>
<p><strong>Quick Conclusion</strong> &#8211; For Google shorter URLs help rankings &#038; comment spam does hurt rankings.</p>
<p>For you SEO types wistful for the days of chasing the green fairy, there is even a graphical visualization of pagerank in their test matrix.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://jeffrandom.com/images/pagerank-visualization.png" alt="Pagerank Visualization" /></center></p>
<p>The paths are similiar to natural forms. That fits with the idea that <a href="http://jeffrandom.com/2005/08/13/what-search-can-learn-from-evolution/">evolution is efficent search</a> leading leading to winning forms. Perhaps we will find that the closer advanced visualizations resemble natural forms, that the visualization improves and/or the engines become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/animated-search-engine-bot-crawl-visualizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secure, Memorable &amp; Global</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/secure-memorable-global/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/secure-memorable-global/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2006/02/09/secure-memorable-global/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making your brand Secure, Memorable, and Global sounds like what an IP firm, and or marketing agency should do for you. As domain names = brands more and more it&#8217;s also the properties that you would like to have your indentifier (brand and/or URL) have on the internet. Up until now Zooko&#8216;s Triangle has argued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making your brand <strong>Secure</strong>, <strong>Memorable</strong>, and <strong>Global </strong>sounds like what an IP firm, and or marketing agency should do for you.  As domain names = brands more and more it&#8217;s also the properties that you would like to have your indentifier (brand and/or URL) have on the internet.  </p>
<p>Up until now <a href="http://zooko.com/distnames.html">Zooko</a>&#8216;s Triangle has argued for &#8216;choose any two&#8217; in the same way that you can generally &#8216;choose any two&#8217; amongst <strong>Good</strong>, <strong>Fast </strong>&#038; <strong>Cheap</strong>. </p>
<p>Now Marc Steigler suggests a system for making &#8220;secure, memorable, and global identifiers to use on the Internet&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.skyhunter.com/marcs/petnames/IntroPetNames.html"><center><img src='/images/zookotriangle.gif' alt='PetNames' /></center></a><br />
The PetName system allows unique, global, and memorable identifiers by using trusted relationships.</p>
<p>The metatheory extrapolates well whether you use the example of preventing paypal phishing, or apply the theory to purchase recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/secure-memorable-global/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Backlinks -Search Conversations</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/beyond-backlinks-search-conversations/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/beyond-backlinks-search-conversations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrated Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalized Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2005/12/29/beyond-backlinks-search-conversations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TalkDigger is a great tool that lets you search conversations about a specific URL. This is a metasearch that covers Technorati, Google Blog, Bloglines, Feedster, BlogDigger, Icerocket, MSN Search, Google, Yahoo! You can outuput the results as an RSS feed to keep track of your sites and stay involved in the conversation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TalkDigger is a great tool that lets you search conversations about a specific URL.<br />
<a href="http://www.talkdigger.com/"><center><img src='/images/talkdigger.gif' alt='Talk Digger' /></center></a><br />
This is a metasearch that covers Technorati, Google Blog, Bloglines, Feedster, BlogDigger, Icerocket, MSN Search, Google, Yahoo!<br />
You can outuput the results as an RSS feed to keep track of your sites and stay involved in the conversation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/beyond-backlinks-search-conversations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MetaData, SEO FireFox Plugin</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/metadata-seo-firefox-plugin/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/metadata-seo-firefox-plugin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM - Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2005/11/24/metadata-seo-firefox-plugin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;About This Site&#8221; is a plugin for Firefox that makes it easy to check: * Alexa traffic detail and related sites * Del.icio.us linkbacks * Google related pages, cache and link information * Kinja site readers * Netcraft reports * Open Directory site listing * Popdex search for citations * Technorati link cosmos * Wayback [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://scribbling.net/projects/firefoxextensions/aboutsite/"><img src='/images/aboutthissite.jpg' alt='About This Site FireFox Plugin ' /></a></center></p>
<p>&#8220;About This Site&#8221;  is a plugin for Firefox that makes it easy to check:</p>
<p>    * Alexa traffic detail and related sites<br />
    * Del.icio.us linkbacks<br />
    * Google related pages, cache and link information<br />
    * Kinja site readers<br />
    * Netcraft reports<br />
    * Open Directory site listing<br />
    * Popdex search for citations<br />
    * Technorati link cosmos<br />
    * Wayback Machine archive<br />
    * Whois query<br />
    * Yahoo linkdomain</p>
<p>This plugin to show metadata is very useful for SEO as well as SEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/metadata-seo-firefox-plugin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personalized Social Search</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/personalized-social-search/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/personalized-social-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personalized Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2005/10/29/personalized-social-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my friends takes great joy in tormenting Google cheerleaders. He likes to say things like &#8220;I&#8217;m going to use Yahoo, it&#8217;s the best search engine&#8221;, or &#8220;I&#8217;m going to Yahoo for it, that way I will actually find it&#8221;. When he wants to find something Y! is the first place that he goes. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my friends takes great joy in tormenting Google cheerleaders.  He likes to say things like &#8220;I&#8217;m going to use Yahoo, it&#8217;s the best search engine&#8221;, or &#8220;I&#8217;m going to Yahoo for it, that way I will actually find it&#8221;. When he wants to find something Y! is the first place that he goes.</p>
<p>What makes this funy is that he makes a good part of his living through &#8220;creative search engine marketing&#8221; and is generally much more able to game Yahoo than Google.   </p>
<p>But now it looks like a lot more people may be thinking his way. Yahoo has launched personalized social search.</p>
<blockquote><p>Save to My Web is a simple, sociable button you can add to any and every page of your blog or website. Users click to save your content and add it directly to their stored pages on My Web 2.0. From there, the page is easy to retrieve, and easy to share with others. &#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p>By distributing the tagging/microchunking of content to it&#8217;s users, Yahoo goes from <strong>search &#038; communities</strong> (Y! groups) to <strong>search + communities + reconstructor</strong>.  This could be the missing piece for the Yahoo triple play, a la <a href="http://jeffrandom.com/2005/10/18/media-20-strategic-maxims/">Media 2.0 Strategic Maxims</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em> <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001976.php"> via </a>John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/personalized-social-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Engine Ranking Factors</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2005/10/07/search-engine-ranking-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEOmoz &#124; Search Engine Ranking Factors Here is a list of factors in SERPs, aggregated &#038; weighted by a very respectable group of SEOs. Excellent reference for SEO.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/articles/search-ranking-factors.php">SEOmoz | Search Engine Ranking Factors</a></p>
<p>Here is a list of factors in SERPs, aggregated &#038; weighted by a very respectable group of SEOs.  Excellent reference for SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO &#8211; Prioritizing terms in a two term keyword phrase</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/seo-prioritizing-terms-in-a-two-term-keyword-phrase/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/seo-prioritizing-terms-in-a-two-term-keyword-phrase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 06:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffrandom.com/2005/09/23/prioritizing-terms-in-a-two-term-keyword-phrase/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Targeting Documents and Terms Through Co-Occurrence Datais a paper written by Dr. Garcia. In which he explains in detail how to choose which keyword in a two term phrase to focus on for SEO. By way of example the phrase &#8220;car insurance&#8221; is analyzed, with the end result showing that it is better to target [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.miislita.com/semantics/c-index-3.html"> <img src="http://www.jeffrandom.com/images/keywordphrase.gif" alt="Keyword Phrase" /></a> </p>
<p>Targeting Documents and Terms Through Co-Occurrence Datais a paper written by Dr. Garcia. In which  he explains in detail how to choose which keyword in a two term phrase to focus on for SEO.</p>
<p>By way of example the phrase &#8220;car insurance&#8221; is analyzed, with the end result showing that it is better to target &#8220;insurance&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;car&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thus by focusing your efforts on the less competitive term, you can maximize your optimization for the two term keyphrase. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/seo-prioritizing-terms-in-a-two-term-keyword-phrase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Media Economics Today</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/new-media-economics-today/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/new-media-economics-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    <em>"Work It Harder Make It Better Do It Faster, Makes Us stronger" DaftPunk</em>
<p> Looking at revenues &#038; users for Ebay, Yahoo &#038; Google is where new media economics really begins to come into it's own. This is web 2.0 theory being proven in the market.
 </p>

Times of great change mean times of great opportunity.  



        <p><em><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/uploaded_images/valueregressions-785569.gif">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/uploaded_images/valueregressions-783850.gif" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;"/>
</a>
<br />Web 2.0 is a shift to from tight, hierarchical architectures which realize exponential network FX, to loosely structured architecture which realize combinatorial network FX. <br />
<br />More simply, Web 2.0 is about the shift from network search economies, which realize mild exponential gains - your utility is bounded by the number of things (people, etc) you can <em>find</em> on the network - to network coordination economies, which realize combinatorial gains: your utility is bounded by the number of things (transactions, etc) you can <em>do</em> on the network. <br /></div></em></p>
        ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    <em>&#8220;Work It Harder Make It Better Do It Faster, Makes Us stronger&#8221; <a href="http://daftpunk">DaftPunk</a></em></p>
<p> Looking at revenues &#038; users for Ebay, Yahoo &#038; Google is where new media economics really begins to come into it&#8217;s own. This is web 2.0 theory being proven in the market today.
 </p>
<p>Times of great change mean times of great opportunity.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.jeffrandom.com/images/valueregressions-783850.gif"><img src="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/uploaded_images/valueregressions-783850.gif"/></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Web 2.0 is a shift to from tight, hierarchical architectures which realize exponential network FX, to loosely structured architecture which realize combinatorial network FX. </p>
<p>More simply, Web 2.0 is about the shift from network search economies, which realize mild exponential gains &#8211; your utility is bounded by the number of things (people, etc) you can <em>find</em> on the network &#8211; to network coordination economies, which realize combinatorial gains: your utility is bounded by the number of things (transactions, etc) you can <em>do</em> on the network. </p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2005/09/web-2.cfm">bubblegeneration </a>- strategy, business models, and innovation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/new-media-economics-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Trust</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/the-value-of-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/the-value-of-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalized Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    	<p>Who wants to own content?</p>
<p>Distribution is not king. </p>
	<p>Content is not king. </p>
	<p>Conversation is the kingdom.</p>
	<p>The war is over and the army that wasnâ€™t even fighting â€” the army of all of us, the ones who werenâ€™t in charge, the ones without the arms â€” won. The big guys who owned the big guns still donâ€™t know it. But they lost.</p>
	<p>In our <a href="http://bubblegeneration.com">media 2.0</a>, web 2.0, <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/08/08/media-no-more/">post-media</a>, post-scarcity, <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2005_06_06.html#009807">small-is-the-new-big</a>, open-source, gift-economy world of the empowered and connected individual, the value is no longer in maintaining an exclusive hold on things. The value is no longer in <em>owning</em> content or distribution. </p>
	<p>The value is in relationships. The value is in trust.  </p>
	<p><center>::::</center></p>
	
        <p><em><p><strong><a href="www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas_pr.html?ReBlogSessionID=3a54ad8d3f70d5553bcf6168803b81ba">Information wants to be free</a> while trust wants to be earned.</strong></p>
<p>We pay attention to those that we trust.</p>

<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/network.html">Trust
in network environments</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/need.html">The need for a
cognitive model of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/model.html">The socio-cognitive
model of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/beliefs.html">The beliefs of
trust: what X thinks about Y</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/motivation.html">The
"Motivation belief" of trust<br />
</a><a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/yinyang.html">Yin-yang trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/internalexternal.html">Internal
and external trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/sources.html">The sources of
trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/irrationality.html">Trust and
irrationality</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/degrees.html">Degrees of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/risk.html">Trust and risk</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/delegation.html">Trust and
delegation</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/control.html">Trust and control</a>
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/adjustable.html">Trust and
adjustable autonomy</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/dynamics.html">The dynamics of
trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/experiences.html">Trust and
experiences</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/elicits.html">Trust elicits
trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/atmosphere.html">Trust
atmosphere</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/contracts.html">Trust as a three
parties relationship: contracts and authorities</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/communicative.html">Trust as a
communicative act</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/fuzzy.html">Trust as a fuzzy
network</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/contractnets.html">Trust in
contract nets</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/technology.html">Trust, security
and technology</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/understanding.html">Trust and
technical knowledge</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/knowledge.html">Trust and
knowledge management</a>

</em></p>
        ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Jeff from BuzzMachine says:   	</p>
<p>Who wants to own content?</p>
<p>Distribution is not king. </p>
<p>Content is not king. </p>
<p>Conversation is the kingdom.</p>
<p>The war is over and the army that wasnâ€™t even fighting â€” the army of all of us, the ones who werenâ€™t in charge, the ones without the arms â€” won. The big guys who owned the big guns still donâ€™t know it. But they lost.</p>
<p>In our <a href="http://bubblegeneration.com">media 2.0</a>, web 2.0, <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/08/08/media-no-more/">post-media</a>, post-scarcity, <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2005_06_06.html#009807">small-is-the-new-big</a>, open-source, gift-economy world of the empowered and connected individual, the value is no longer in maintaining an exclusive hold on things. The value is no longer in <em>owning</em> content or distribution. </p>
<p>The value is in relationships. The value is in trust.  </p>
<p></em>    &#8211; <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/">Link </a></p>
<p><center><strong><a href="www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas_pr.html?ReBlogSessionID=3a54ad8d3f70d5553bcf6168803b81ba">Information wants to be free</a> while trust wants to be earned.<br />
We pay attention to those that we trust.</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/network.html">Trust in network environments</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/need.html">The need for a cognitive model of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/model.html">The socio-cognitive model of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/beliefs.html">The beliefs of trust: what X thinks about Y</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/motivation.html">The &#8220;Motivation belief&#8221; of trust </a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/yinyang.html">Yin-yang trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/internalexternal.html">Internal and external trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/sources.html">The sources of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/irrationality.html">Trust and irrationality</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/degrees.html">Degrees of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/risk.html">Trust and risk</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/delegation.html">Trust and delegation</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/control.html">Trust and control</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/adjustable.html">Trust and adjustable autonomy</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/dynamics.html">The dynamics of trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/experiences.html">Trust and experiences</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/elicits.html">Trust elicits trust</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/atmosphere.html">Trust atmosphere</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/contracts.html">Trust as a three parties relationship: contracts and authorities</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/communicative.html">Trust as a communicative act</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/fuzzy.html">Trust as a fuzzy network</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/contractnets.html">Trust in contract nets</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/technology.html">Trust, security and technology</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/understanding.html">Trust and technical knowledge</a><br />
<a href="http://www.istc.cnr.it/T3/trust/pages/knowledge.html">Trust and knowledge management</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/the-value-of-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Search can learn from Evolution</title>
		<link>http://jeffrandom.com/what-search-can-learn-from-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://jeffrandom.com/what-search-can-learn-from-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r8ndom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalized Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    	<p>&#8220;<strong>Evolution has a nearly infinite multiplier on its search power and it just happens to invest its search effort in the mathematically optimal most efficient search allocation</strong>&#8221; <em><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=156877&#038;threshold=1&#038;commentsort=0&#038;tid=14&#038;mode=thread&#038;cid=13153263">link</a></em></p>
	<p>Sometimes closing your eyes gets you exactly where you want to go.  Evolution is blind, in that mutations occur without design. Yet even so, evolution produces the most optimal adaptation for any given environment over time. </p>
	<p>&#8220;<strong>Evolution is an information processing system building vast database of information and synthesizing complex measurements of that information and doing an incredibly powerful search and mining of that information database to discover and refine improvements</strong>.&#8221; <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=156877&#038;threshold=1&#038;commentsort=0&#038;tid=14&#038;mode=thread&#038;cid=13153263">link</a></p>
	<p>Sounds a lot like what some of the <a href="http://www.google.com/ig" target="_blank">Big</a>  <a href="http://360.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Boys</a> and <a href="http://channelevents.aol.com/whattoexpect/myaol_beta.html" target="_blank">others</a> are up to, as well as some of <a href="http://myspace.com/">other </a>players.<br />
<strong><br />
One of the obvious models that Search can learn from Evolution is consequences.</strong></p>
	<p><img src="http://www.jeffrandom.com/images/death.jpg" alt="TGP Case Study" class="alignright"/>In nature, adaptations/mutations have consequences.  Constant feedback is provided by the environment using signals ranging from prosperity to death.</p>
	<p>The adult entertainment industry has been doing this for years via Toplists, <a href="http://jeffrandom.com/business/category/tgp-case-study/">TGPs </a><em>(self sorting based on productivity)</em>, and partner accounts <em>(symbiotic relationships)</em>.</p>
	<p>Google is on the track with the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/?quick=toolbaroptions">toolbar voting buttons</a>, and others like <a href="http://del.icio.us/doc/about">del.icio.us</a> are even further along.</p>
	<p><strong>More accurate/efficient feedback means  shorter cycles/generations which means less time to optimization.</strong></p>
	<p>Not many people bother to give feedback unless it is automatic, or they see immediate benefit from doing so.  Personalization or Customization is terrific incentive for people to give feedback.<br />
<strong><br />
Maybe what Search needs is to introduce Death into the equation?</strong></p>

            ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<strong>Evolution has a nearly infinite multiplier on its search power and it just happens to invest its search effort in the mathematically optimal most efficient search allocation</strong>&#8221; <em><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=156877&#038;threshold=1&#038;commentsort=0&#038;tid=14&#038;mode=thread&#038;cid=13153263">link</a></em></p>
<p>Sometimes closing your eyes gets you exactly where you want to go.  Evolution is blind, in that mutations occur without design. Yet even so, evolution produces the most optimal adaptation for any given environment over time. </p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>Evolution is an information processing system building vast database of information and synthesizing complex measurements of that information and doing an incredibly powerful search and mining of that information database to discover and refine improvements</strong>.&#8221; <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=156877&#038;threshold=1&#038;commentsort=0&#038;tid=14&#038;mode=thread&#038;cid=13153263">link</a></p>
<p>Sounds a lot like what some of the <a href="http://www.google.com/ig" target="_blank">Big</a>  <a href="http://360.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Boys</a> and <a href="http://channelevents.aol.com/whattoexpect/myaol_beta.html" target="_blank">others</a> are up to, as well as some of <a href="http://myspace.com/">other </a>players.<br />
<strong><br />
One of the obvious models that Search can learn from Evolution is consequences.</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.jeffrandom.com/images/death.jpg" alt="TGP Case Study" class="alignright"/>In nature, adaptations/mutations have consequences.  Constant feedback is provided by the environment using signals ranging from prosperity to death.</p>
<p>The adult entertainment industry has been doing this for years via Toplists, <a href="http://jeffrandom.com/business/category/tgp-case-study/">TGPs </a><em>(self sorting based on productivity)</em>, and partner accounts <em>(symbiotic relationships)</em>.</p>
<p>Google is on the track with the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/?quick=toolbaroptions">toolbar voting buttons</a>, and others like <a href="http://del.icio.us/doc/about">del.icio.us</a> are even further along.</p>
<p><strong>More accurate/efficient feedback means  shorter cycles/generations which means less time to optimization.</strong></p>
<p>Not many people bother to give feedback unless it is automatic, or they see immediate benefit from doing so.  Personalization or Customization is terrific incentive for people to give feedback.<br />
<strong><br />
Maybe what Search needs is to introduce Death into the equation?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeffrandom.com/what-search-can-learn-from-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

